No Mutants Allowed

Nobody is ignoring anything except you. You are arguing something that wasn't even discussed to begin with and seemingly hallucinating parts of it.

The Russian hacking and Russian collusion narrative go hand-in-hand, I'd say it was still relevant to the conversation.

It was but you want to run from the question as you have not a single bit of proof of such a hilarious and ridiculous claim. So you just insult others instead, which is becoming tiresome gibberish but what do I expect when dealing with you?

Except when I initially talked about a system rigged in favor of the rich there was nothing about Russian collusion. Are you guys trolling or just stupid? Are you even reading what I am writting or are you in autopilot?

You managed to flop around on that subject plenty enough, having switched from the government favors richer candidates and then switching back to the Russia narrative. I'd say that wasn't really a cohesive argument.

No, yu guys got confused after reading a single phrase without paying attention and then started on a tangent about Russian hacking while also showing you juss believe everything is fake because Trumpy said so.

You serious? I asked for hacking proof and you switch it up with something else in this case the article with the "in favor of the rich". You tried to change the subject in an attempt to make me look stupid. Your arguments fall apart when all you have to offer in return is petty insults directed towards me.

If you'd remember, I actually skimmed through that article. There was nothing there except a sentence or two that hinted towards Russian collusion.

Wow you guys truly are retarded. You are still on the Russian collusion thread about my argument about the system being rigged in favor of the richest? Because holy shit, it's kind of incredible how dense you both are.

I even stated I still think Trump won fair and square like 100 messages prior. It's just bouncing off your thick skulls.

Again, I remember going through that argument with you, you brought that article up in the middle of a talk about how Russia was entangled in the last election, it did not hold any relevance to the conversation from what I remember.

Again you are pretty retarded if you think "System is rigged in favor of the rich" Means "RUSSIAN COLLUSION!"

Which you implied that when you linked us to that article in the middle of a conversation about the supposed Russian collusion.

Man, you guys must have learning disabilities. I should stop making fun of you...

The argument was, Snake claiming there were no active investigations, then I linked to something that directly stated there was. THen criticized the experience Trump has as anything other than an idle rich and snake claimedthat he is rich so he knows what he is doing, to which then I stated the system is rigged in favor of the rich. See, it's all nice, if you get it gold star for you.

You talk about some Russian collusion and then say he won fair and square? Man I'm wasting my time with this autistic screeching. Calling people stupid that can't read is all that you can do as the one trick pony you are. You just enjoy that wonderful socialism and other dogshit.

Well you would probably understand if you actually knew how to read. But that ship sailed long ago.

1. No one knows to what extend Russia was involved in to the whole ellection or if there even was some involved to begin with. Hence why you do investigations - what a novell idea. And often they take a lot of time, sometimes years. Don't expect to get anwsers tomorrow and don't just parrot "it's all fake news anyway!"

2. By constnatly talking about Obama, even right now, you guys are NOT(!) doing your self any favour. See, Obama is bad. Hillary is bad. But Trump is simply worse. And anyone who's unbiased should actually acknowledge that. I mean seriously, not even the REPUBLICANS in the Senate agreed to some of his stuff.

3. People defending Trump remind me to a cult. And this discussion right now ... liberals bring up stuff they didn't bring about Obama, when republicans didn't bring up when Bush was president, which democrats didn't bring up when Bill Clinton was president. Do you guys not see the pattern here?