Yeah well mark meechan was found guilty of being "grossly offensive". That means nothing. Found guilty on what proof?
I didn't say it wasn't admissible I'm saying testimony by itself is not good evidence. I mean fuck off ever heard of the Salem witch trials?
>>Saying rape victims suing the one who raped them in the past is the same as witch hunt And that's why Grapes is always wrong, people.
No not wrong. "He did it I swear" will never be solid evidence in my eyes. Much less "he did it 30 years ago and ive just been sitting on this knowledge for no reason" Also great pun btw.