Search results

I guess I would a feel a bit sad but really wouldn't care that much anyways, since I never use this place. I think there was a point where I didn't posted anything on this website for a year.

Completely forgot about this game, thanks for reminding me.

I'm simply voting yes because gamers are known for having very bad taste.

The total conversion mods are the only things that interests me too. The only F4 TC mod that interests me that's not a remake of the old Fallouts is Fallout Cascadia, which has received no progress updates in a while. It's literally dead silence on their youtube channel and Facebook. Two years...

What's more depressing is that these problems are also nothing new. In Skyrim you could swing your sword, use destructive magic, and shoot arrows around people and nobody reacts to anything you do until you finally hit somebody. This problem even goes as far back to oblivion. Even GTA San...

Downloading so many mods for any Bethesda game is not even a good thing anyways. It just makes it prone to more crashing and adds even more bugs.

This. I was about the type the same thing. It's the same for Fallout 4. Most mods are just bug fixes, minor re-balances, and coomer bait bullshit.

I honestly think people are just buying starfield just for the future mods. Every comment I ever see in a starfield video always has something to do with modding potential. I never see anyone actually praise the game for what it is.

You would think a game company that has worked on three post-apocalyptic games would put more effort into making Earth actually feel like an abandoned planet instead of placing one tower in a desert in the middle of nowhere with no lore explanation for why it's perfectly preserved for no reason...

Amazing how it's 2023 and Bethesda still makes games that looks like they were made for PS3.

I actually think the black one with the purple hair looks cute.

This is basically why I always strictly follow the old definition for RPGs. The modern definition is way too loose. Anything can be an RPG these days as long as it has basic stats.

The most common reason why people say this, is because, according to them, starfield is more of a rpg focus experience while NMS and Elite are more sandbox and exploration base. Which I always found to be a very ironic argument since Bethesda has been severely cutting down on rpg elements in all...

I feel like all the Bethesda fans that say that Starfield can't be compared to no man's sky and Elite: dangerous because Starfield is a different genre of space sim to be cope at this point.

Yeah, that's what yongyea did with Cp2077 before it released. I think he got a review copy and was talking about how cyberpunk was a masterpiece. Then it actually came out and that wasn't the case. Lost a lot of respect for him after that.

So far it seems like most game journalist and youtube reviewers are loving StarField. Does that mean it's good. Maybe. I doubt it.

What's infuriating about starfield is that you can't criticize this game without being called a "pony". Because anyone who doesn't like the the latest thing is just Sony fanboy.

Takes 10 minutes before reaching the invisible barrier. What a joke.

Damnit. Was hoping it would be in the east coast so they don't fuck with the west coast lore that much.