Search results

Also: bullet crowns.

Better arm all the kids, too, in case armed teachers start shooting.

SuA was obviously just here to enlighten the unwashed NMA plebs with his rock-solid "so true it's as obvious as the moon orbiting the earth duh" knowledge, not to actually debate or anything. Debating is for people whose every statement isn't undisputable gospel.

I don't expect you to follow my every argument and refute everything I link. I linked one thing. And asked you for evidence for one specific questionable statement said link was posted in reply to. HOW UNREASONABLE OF ME.

Really, that's it? Comparing a non-trivial claim to "the moon orbits the earth"? I'm not being obnoxious, I provided a rebuttal with a link, which you dismissed out of hand without providing anything in return. You're just playing the pigeon chess tactic and I seriously doubt that you just don't...

This is not an opinion: "Israel had a terrorist & school shooter problem, up until they started to allow teachers and janitors to go about their job armed. After that? No real issue remained." It's either a fact or not. If it's a fact, there's gotta be evidence. Otherwise it's either a blatant...

I totally forgot that random anecdotes are the only really reliable kind of evidence. "Guns aren't there" was never the argument. There's just no real evidence for your claim that Israeli schools are an example of "more guns will fix it".

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/NewsItem/tabid/178/nid/23572/Default.aspx Got another example? Your first one just went up in flames.

I think I once saw a survey involving criminals and those who used guns in their crimes often stated self-defence as a main reason. A more heavily armed populace might lead to more heavily armed criminals. And of course a larger pool of available guns, since gun theft is a major source for...

Josh Homme, frontman of Queens Of The Stone Age.

Including live nuclear warheads? Yeah, I don't think so. Dirty bombs are less effective in killing people than regular bombs.

It's weird when you get an alert that someone quoted your post and you realize it's from five years ago.

Job? Bitch, school was work enough as it was. Not that I ever did much. But still.

Take that, global warming alarmists.

See my post above, there was only one intruder. He did use a crowbar to gain entry but the circumstances of the story are greatly exaggerated to better fit his POV.

Do you? I'd bet the data, if there is any, isn't very meaningful either way but definitely won't support "guns save FAR more lives than they take".

You've embellished that story quite a bit, eh? It was one guy, there's no mention of a biometrically locked case, nor did she call the police before shooting, and the guy survived the encounter. I couldn't find another case of a Georgia woman with 2 kids shooting at crowbar-wielding intruder(s)...

Dat wall-of-text, tho It's not far from illegal. It's literally illegal by law for civilians to own fully automatic weapons with the possibility of exceptions in specific cases, namely historical weapons for collectors. The existence of exceptions does not mean there's no rule. It's not...

I don't think there's such a thing as an ideal tool for self-defense. I'm guessing in most self-defense situations you will find yourself in close range of your attacker, though.

Some cards won't even turn on the fans until they reach a certain temperature. I had a GTX 970 that had the fans off in 2D mode. Removing the CPU fan, on the other hand, will most likely lead to an emergency shutdown immediately after turning on the power.