Search results

Re: Kharn Two things: First, I don't know if you noticed or not, but you didn't post a definition of isometric perspective anywhere in there. So really, there was no point to posting all those other definitions at all. Second, I find it hilarious that you think that posting on a fanboy...

Yeah, cause there's just no way to make a game that has a different camera angle from a game you've made in the past. No sir, that's just out of the question. Christ, I don't know whether to laugh at you or weep for humanity.

Funniest thing I've read all day. And that's not what happened here, guy. What happened here is, a developer said "We're going to make a game," to which you replied "THAT'S SHIT! FPS'S ARE STUPID AND CONSOLE GAMES ARE FOR KIDS!"

Make large-scale, open-ended RPG's?

What? They've run a Fallout site for a few years, therefore they know what they're talking about when it comes to Bethesda's plans for the license? Huh?

Oh sorry, I didn't realize posting a definition was ignorant. Or is that dictionary wrong? If you find a different definition of isometric perspective, I'd love to see it. But based on the definition I found, when someone says "not isometric," they don't necessarily mean "first-person."

Wow. I'm going to be banned for "trolling," which is apparently being the only person here who doesn't make rash assumptions and talk shit on Bethesda?

Then... you'd be staring at nothingness the whole time? I think you mean "What if it stays on the edge, but you can switch which edge; in other words, rotate in 90 degree increments, a la Final Fantasy Tactics?" In that case, yes, it would be isometric. Apparently I should have clarified...

Um... not actually. So if the camera moves from the edge of the cube, the perspective is no long isometric, genius.

Idiot. They said "we aren't going to make a top down isometric Baldur's-gate style game." Do you even know what isometric means? If you can move the camera, it's not isometric.

A) Wow, thanks for guessing my age! You're right, I'm seven! B) The only people who've said that Fallout 3 will be first person are people on this forum and forums like it.

Still don't see where you're getting that idea... it might need to go over to two discs, which would make it a pain in the ass for console players, but you're obviously not concerned about that anyway.

Like what? "We aren't going to make a Baldur's Gate-style game." "We aren't worried about the ESRB rating right now." "Nothing is finalized yet." God, you're a bunch of whiny little children. You don't want to play Fallout 3. It's that simple. You hate Interplay, and you hate...

Too hard? And too big? Buh?

Not necessarily. That works out just fine a lot of the time.

Wow. You know, for a forum full of people who hate Bethesda so much, there sure are a lot of people here who are intimately familiar with their every corporate move.

THEY BOUGHT THE LICENSE YESTERDAY! WHY WOULD THEY START WORKING ON A GAME BEFORE THEY HAD THE FUCKING LICENSE!

Oh, sorry, but I don't remember you being in charge of Bethesda, or otherwise entitled to any answers. Also, you seriously don't think that it's ridiculous to demand that they turn the license over to a different company because they don't have the design done in one day?

Oh, they usually have games completely designed on the day they decide to make it, before they even start working on it? Yeah, ok.

Don't be stupid. How many console-only or console-first M-Rated games come out? GTA? Manhunt? The Suffering? Or to be topical, what about Brotherhood of Steel? Console doesn't imply Teen rating in any way. You people are just whiners who are looking for more reasons to whine.