Search results

I'm aware they're fetch quests, that's why I responded to a comment about a Witcher 3 fetch quest that was apparently fun because it had some back story whereas apparantly no fetch quest in FO4 has any back story, hence why I mentioned several with actual story and most of them With variable...

Please point out where I called you stupid.

I'm hugely interested in seeing where I called you stupid. Not your stupid (and it really is) comparison of turning a game where you build rollercoasters into a gritty fps with nothing to do with rollercoasters being the same thing as a post apoc crpg becoming a post apoc fps, but where I called...

This is getting completely off topic to the point of no return now but There's a hefty number of quests like that in 4. The Cabot quest, the Quest to finish Valentine's case his friend started, retaking the Castle, the Silver Shroud, curing Cait, the Eddie Winters tapes, the first Finch Farm...

At no point has my argument with him (or his as he seems to only be replying to my comments about the main quest) focused on optional radiant quests that have no bearing on the main game.

Rollercoaster Tycoon going from a fun build and manage to a gritty first person shooter is not the same thing as A gritty post apoc iso CRPG with guns turning into a 'gritty' post apoc FPS with guns. It's a stupid comparison and doesn't hold water. He didn't say every quest finished with...

The Rollercoaster Tycoon bit is what I was referring to, although saying the game is just kill, loot, return is kinda silly too because it's removing what the quest actually is and narrowing it down into containing elements that virtually the bulk of quests in NV featured too. You're nearly...

Do you know what the word means? " disingenuous ˌdɪsɪnˈdʒɛnjʊəs/ adjective not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does." I can assure you pal, I was being very sincere with my response to your ridiculous statement.

Now you're just being ridiculous.

How is F4 a 'decent' build and manage? You have limited crafting options, lifeless settlers and the same 4 settlement quests repeated. I don't know why you keep mentioning Borderlands when talking about the story, as far as I remember you were just searching for treasure in Borderlands.

Yeah, I completely get that. Fallout 4 doesn't really feel like a Fallout game in most ways, I;d actually argue BoS felt more Fallout-y. i just think a decent build and manage game set in the Fallout universe could of been pretty cool, and despite it's flaws, I actually didn't mind a lot of the...

I wasn't asking what people thought about the vanilla crafting/settlement system. I was asking people if they thought that Fallout 4's setting would of been better suited to a Tropico styled game where you actually built up the commonwealth and the Minutemen into an almost NCR styled system as...

I honestly had no idea about the mod, Frontiers was just the most applicable title I could think of. I only wanted to discuss how the elements of Fallout 4 that were good/kinda good could be expanded and how the elements that were not good could be replaced and how that version of 4 could fit...

I think it'd take a lot of time to get to any kind of real unity. It wasn't that long ago that Europe was at constant war with itself in the real world. But I think if say NCR grew a bit more and entered a coalition with some smaller states they could, in time, become something much greater and...

I'm sure it has nothing to do with people shooting down any discussion that doesn't start with "Fallout 4 is worse than hitler because" That isn't what being disingenuous means. I guess you're right, I have been posting semi regularly for 4 days. I should know better than to discuss...

3 is pretty solid, 2 was alright. Neither is better than NV, F1 or F2 though.

It's disingenuous to suggest there was no main quest whatsoever or that there was no wider story, no matter how poorly written, present.

Please no lazy replies, if you hate the game fine, but there's no reason to be disingenuous.

I just can't see the NCR resorting to nukes against a mostly civilian/slave population out of spite.

Why is it the most likely outcome? The Courier is decided by the player, it's just as likely the Courier wouldn't of nuked them.