Search results

It's just your comment that the Courier would of absolutely nuked Arizona is a false equivalence.

I was NCR on most of my playthroughs and I've never once nuked Arizona.

Like, if you removed the main quest but kept and improved the settlement building side of it (still have the first person shootery shit and scavenging and all that) and sort of left it as semi canon would you guys have hated it less? I've always thought the base building stuff felt wasted...

EVERYONE is illuminate now

I'm in a horrible no man's land where I'm notably more forgiving to FO4 than the guys here are but notably more critical than the Bethesda fans are. Could say I'm on a bit of a lonesome road

Part of me really thinks Fallout 4 should of been a Sims based spin off.

I can't see a nation that wants to rebuild the old world using nukes.

Plot device, that's literally all they are.

I was actually thinking about making the comparison of Legion being like Russia and NCR like Germany in Stalingrad if we were going to follow the siege notion. NCR are far better equipped, but it doesn't matter if they're not getting resupplied regularly and they really need to hold decent...

The Witcher 3 is legitimately better than Fallout 3/4 though.

I think Tom has a good point about a war of attrition, although I do not think it'll be enough to stop the legion it'd certainly put them in a very uncomfortable place. Although equally, maybe more so, the NCR cannot take many hits to their supply lines or they'll lose more troops than they can...

Yeah it's probably for show, although the working electric, clean water supply, financial wealth and, as we stated earlier infrastructure were probably also key factors in the choice.

Were Legion directly attacking Raiders and Fiends? I was under the assumption they left the Fiendsand various raiders be because they were making trouble for the NCR

Sorry, when you directly responded to my post directly responding to the claim the graphics looked like they were from the last gen of consoles I;m gonna take the reasonable assumption that by directly responding to my post directly responding to the claim the graphics looked like they were from...

Then don't say "the characters look like theyre from last gen" if you don't want me to use an example from last gen. It's not a hard concept. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mkWfsERyX7g/maxresdefault.jpg http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/143/590x/Black-Ops-3-Zombies-update-614297.jpg...

She does it from time to time, as one of her idle animations. https://www.reddit.com/r/Fallout/comments/3t4hdl/piper_smoking_bug_no_spoilers/ http://66.media.tumblr.com/bacbb936b9fc263c50b413aca46a76fa/tumblr_nygh8nUSLp1ri8h0lo1_540.gif Little bit more about it, I've never had the glitch...

"we weren't lazy by accident, it was completely deliberate that we left a game breaking bug in"

Well that we agree on, but mediocre doesn't equal bad. Well, I don't know about that. Let's compare FO4 to the Division, or to Black Ops 3, or to MGSV, or to Far Cry Primal, or to any other "AAA" title from last year/this year and see how it shapes up. In that regard it's just a fairly...

To say Fallout 4 is a bad game is simply wrong. You can say you don't like it, you can cite it's trash dialogue system and how much it pisses on the franchise, but it isn't a bad game. And the statement about the standard of AAA games is a moot one, a lot of AAA games are far worse in terms of...

I'm not saying it's not a complete fuck up in that respect, but it's playable, it looks fairly nice, there's enough content to keep it running for a while and there is some good in it. A bad game to me is a game that barely works, is poorly presented or just plays awfully. A la every post Black...