Search results

Might i add and i can almost bet its not the first time they do this with Fallout, they offered it a few years back along with the magazine, Fallout 2 :)

Honestly im quite interested, i have no problem in saying i enjoyed some aspects in Fallout 3, mainly the whole wasteland was nicely done, the rest was poorer, however, since its obsidian and even tho its the same engine, they can work on the story, questlines, maybe some UI changes, etc, things...

That is the worst part, unless they seriously tweak the engine.

Great news indeed. From what i can understand from the post, they're going to use Gamebryo again?

What we can perceive in other hand is that, games are different nowadays, the technology blabber, lights and effects have been the significant part of the "enjoyment" of the games for the wide audience, leaving the rest of the game as secondary, therefore opening a bad precedent for low standard...

At worst, bastardized in a creative way, not the quests associated after you met him, but the whole ideia of making him a God among humans, its a twisted way of how ghouls were perceived by other humans.

Fallout 3 isnt a bad game per se, it has its weakness and strengths, i think the reviewer pointed out the essential ideas of both. In a more cynical way i just wished Beth putted some sort of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault in it for more laughs. Another great...

Even though it still feels like its not by any means a "real" Fallout sequel, by the looks of this reviewer seems like there's some (little) pieces of the Interplay/Black Isle Fallout games, that, the 3D atmosphere (i remember playing Fallout 1/2 and wondered how would it "look" in a first...

I also enjoy the one with the dog, it has a great atmosphere in it and thats what mainly im expecting from Fallout 3, the wasteland. Fingers crossed.