DirtyOldShoe
Some kind of lucky
Try typing in the auto search "CNN is"
Last edited:
It's sad that that is the truth you seek.
Except most of the touchy subjects were censored and you couldn't find them unless you had a link or special knowledge. Also, not everyone has your understanding of the internet. ma and pa that think that the first result must be true would be getting lies, now, it is more accurate to what you are searching for. I don't really care if you think it is a step in the right direction or not. You probably like being told what to think.Wow, they fixed there search algorithms. Big deal.
Like, it's not like anyone actually used them anyway. If you are googling something, you know what you are looking for.
A while back, I tried to prove that breitbart was run by crazy conspiracy theorists, by going through there site and picking out dumb headlines, and I could find it easily just by googling it.Except most of the touchy subjects were censored and you couldn't find them unless you had a link or special knowledge.
Real Mature.
Could you give some examples of what Google is now not censoring?I think we have a different opinion on what touchy subjects are.
Well, one of the first hits (well, #7) for "cnn is" for me is from the Daily Stormer, I assume that's what he's happy about.Could you give some examples of what Google is now not censoring?
...What kinda shit are you actually looking at, man?I'd like to. I really would, but I am not going to provide keywords.
I use things like NoScript and Ghostery for a reason.
If you are not the type to go digging where you shouldn't, then you won't be interested in this censorship lift, that's fine.
Why don't you consider to participate in The battle of the noobs on the Order? I just realized that you would be perfect material.I'd like to. I really would, but I am not going to provide keywords.
I use things like NoScript and Ghostery for a reason.
If you are not the type to go digging where you shouldn't, then you won't be interested in this censorship lift, that's fine.
To simplify, prior to this lift, some topics that many people would get misleading results. Those topics were silenced and hunted down on many social media platforms. Not only is the data showing up appropriately in the auto tag, but also in search results. It is pretty big news for the type of research I do, not so important to others that don't dig too deep.
Absolutely. Short version: Doesn't work. Long version: Nope, doesn't work.The Official Dark Matter "Ask Me About Science" Thread oTO
I'm sure you'd do a fine job explaining them in your science thread. mind-satellites that is.
*thanYou're smarter then you look.
Oh no, I really am smarter, and then I look. Especially when I'm about to cross a road.*than
Can't see any touchy stuff after putting this string in the search querry. It is locked up again?Try typing in the auto search "CNN is"
@zegh8578 Like this