Mr Fish
Slippy sloppy, The
Premier in 3 hours.
Long man, hype?
Long man, hype?
You might not, but i am. Gonna watch it later, excited to see someone trashing this show for the garbage piece of media that it is.Ain't nobody got time for long man.
40 minutes in, mostly agree with what I hear. It's good to see review from a person that has no interest in the franchise and judges the show only on it's own merit. Too many people use fan's investment in classic games and NV as a defence for the show even when it falls apart on it's own.
Ain't nobody got time for long man.
The "regular audience" are a bunch of dumbshits.
So now we can excuse every villain's moronic plan because they are a bad guy? Remember when we used to praise villains for their, well, intelligence and cunning, but now apparently villains can be idiots because that's what a bad guy is.She's a bad guy
So now we can excuse every villain's moronic plan because they are a bad guy? Remember when we used to praise villains for their, well, intelligence and cunning, but now apparently villains can be idiots because that's what a bad guy is.
But that's kinda the thing, the initial attack on the vault is the only thing that characterises as a bad guy. She kidnaps Hank because he nuked and entire city, and she's characterised as in opposition to Vault-Tec and a genius who worked on cold fusion and survived since the War.I mean the complaints about her plan being moronic are that they're immoral and she should give a shit about Rose's children just because they're Rose's children. Which she doesn't because she's a bad guy.
Oh and that she hired someone to smuggle Wilzig to Griffith Observatory in secret versus bringing her forces to Filly.
When, in fact, that plan would have worked fine if not for the fact that the Ghoul is a One Man Army.
But that's kinda the thing, the initial attack on the vault is the only thing that characterises as a bad guy. She kidnaps Hank because he nuked and entire city, and she's characterised as in opposition to Vault-Tec and a genius who worked on cold fusion and survived since the War.
The only thing that really characterises her as a bad guy, the only thing she does as a bad guy, is letting her raiders rape and pillage vault 33, which was frankly quite unnecessary and uncharacteristic for her, insofar anything can be seen as characteristic since she hasn't really been characterised a whole lot.
So, Fallout 3 all over but with a TV audience now instead.Finishing the video and yup, this show is just basically Fallout 3 again. A piece of media made by people that have no clue what the franchise is about, using recognizable iconography to try to distract the viewer from the horrid writing and poorly written story. And it worked given how many people, many that didn't even played the games, liked it because like i said above, they have no context as to why it's bad.
Finishing the video and yup, this show is just basically Fallout 3 again. A piece of media made by people that have no clue what the franchise is about, using recognizable iconography to try to distract the viewer from the horrid writing and poorly written story. And it worked given how many people, many that didn't even played the games, liked it because like i said above, they have no context as to why it's bad.
Not really surprised by the end result given that apparently the showrunner only played Fallout 3 (from what i read anyway).
I have long grown numb to the franchise's corpse being paraded around to try to make as much money as possible anyway, this shit doesn't affect me anymore. Still fun to make fun of it and watch the fans of it seethe in rage at the people criticizing it.
So, Fallout 3 all over but with a TV audience now instead.
Or bots, because I keep seeing them on videos that are negative about the show. Arch got some, SyntheticMan got lots of them, Creetosis is still getting them, and Mauler will get some too I'm sure.
That and defenders keep holding up Rotten Tomatoes as proof the show is good, even though we can't see individual reviews anymore, and the site has been shown to not delete bot reviews for certain kinds of movies or shows in the past.
https://www.pajiba.com/tv_reviews/i...ly-one-who-didnt-rate-the-fallout-tv-show.phpThe same thing seems to have happened with Amazon Prime’s Fallout TV show. It started out strong enough! The Last Of Us did, too. Many of these things seem to have a powerful, well-crafted opening, where the basics of storytelling are adhered to, tension and conflict are understood, and compelling worlds (lent to them by existing properties, in the case of these adaptations) are introduced. Fallout’s first episode had me keen on seeing more of the show. And then, just like The Last Of Us, it lost me faster than you can say: ‘Well, hang on, why should I care about all this again?’ (to be fair to The Last Of Us, it was still a lot better at that than Fallout, but still). I just couldn’t find myself caring about anything that happened onscreen. The actors were all good, and the Wasteland looked more lived-in and authentic than many modern post-apocalyptic environments, but the characters felt hollow, and the narrative empty of any compelling hook, its arcs weak and listless.
You don't need to play the game to put pointless references in your product. House behaves absolutely nothing like he does in the actual game, so it's clear the showrunner hasn't played the game.I mean, he obviously played New Vegas since the show is dripping with New Vegas references.