The RPG Genre is fucked up

Brother None

This ghoul has seen it all
Orderite
Angry Gamers are still angry, and Bethesda does not dodge their ire this time either.<blockquote>What do I consider a good CRPG? Fallout 1 and 2 (they’re two separate parts, but it’s essentially one big story) are good examples. They offer you freedom, actions and consequences, all with great motivation. You are free to do all sorts of things for all sorts of reasons, but beware the repercussions. This created a way to contribute to the story.

In the original Fallout games I’ve killed all kinds of living beings, including children. Sometimes I earned money by killing, sometimes people wanted to blast me away for it. I’ve made money of cannibalism. I ****ed women to get what I want. I even had sex with a sixteen year old and got married to her because her dad caught me and forced me to the altar with a shotgun. I made promises to people and stabbed them all in the back, allowing me to get filthy ****ing rich in the process. I made and sold drugs, and even used it to temporarily up my strength, and became addicted after a couple of uses too much. I had philosophical discussions with mortal enemies, and the list goes on and on. It even contained homosexuality, something a lot of so called RPGs avoid like the plague. At the end you could even join the ‘bad guy’. Now THAT is contributing to the story.

Also, in Fallout 1 and 2, you couldn’t experience everything with one playthrough. Makes sense, because you’re acting as a persona, and you have limits. You can’t be an amazing sniper, doctor, technician and thief at the same time. Who you created and what you did had consequences, forcing you to think before you start pressing buttons like a twitching idiot.

Modern day CRPGs like Mass Effect and Fallout 3 pale in comparison to Black Isle’s masterpiece. I thoroughly enjoyed Mass Effect for the combat, the epic story and the dialogue system, but when it boils down to it, everything consists of black and white choices. Fallout 3 is even less of an RPG: there’s no real dialogue. It’s just you asking people’s names, jobs and things like that. These are monologues, periodically interrupted by the player. And the choices are even more black and white than Mass Effect, but there’s no reasoning behind them. You can blow up Megaton and you receive a little money for it, but what does it do to you? You’re not hated for it by other people, there are no consequences other than the town being gone, so why would you do it? With my first character I had already slaughtered the entire town with a baseball bat and a 10MM pistol the before I even met this quest giver.
(...)
For me, the list of true RPGs is quite short. Nearly any game involving Tim Cain or a studio he used to be part of (Black Isle and Troika Games). Obsidian Entertainment is looking to be a very promising developer within this genre, especially with their upcoming title Alpha Protocol. And the new Fallout installment will be developed by them and Josh Sawyer, known from Icewind Dale 2, a designer who wasn’t brought into the world by a mother who clearly drank during her pregnancy, like Todd Howard. </blockquote>Are these guys trying to take our place as flagship Bethesda haters*?

Thanks again for the anger, GameBanshee.

* And yes I know that title belongs to RPGCodex
 
"designer who wasn’t brought into the world by a mother who clearly drank during her pregnancy, like Todd Howard."

Awesome. Just... Awesome!
 
Interesting...

Here I was starting to thing everyone loved Fallout 3 :P

Oh right that is just the reviewers, not actual gamers...my bad.

Altra
 
The comment about Todd's mom was over the top, otherwize well written. I particularly like how he liked the Diablo Games but calls them action games. They weren't RPGs but they are still not beneith him.
 
well to say something like "F3 is not a Fallout game" doesnt mean to absolutely hate it if you can name a few reasons why you think it doesnt fitt. Some can have fun and still say its not close to the spirit of the franchise. And yeah ... if you do criticize something in the public you should avoid to attack indidviduals as thats pretty unprofessional and rude.
 
I agree with the core idea of the article, but the attack on Howard is unnecessary. Although since it's "Angry Gamer", not "Rational and Calm Gamer", I guess it fits their style.
 
I think it's a funny article, but I don't really agree with the Mass Effect criticism. The choices were very limited in that game, but they weren't all black and white. The renegade/paragon distinction was different from the lightside/darkside stuff in KotOR and JE.

Also, the praise of Obsidian seems to be completely unreasonable. Using these criteria, a lot of games don't stand up well to FO1/2, including Icewind Dale 2 and every game Obsidian has made. Furthermore, I don't see anything about AP that reminds me of FO1/2. Hell, I don't even think his praise of Cain is reasonable. He made only one game with Troika that stands up well against FO1/2 in a comparison like this, and he's currently working on MMOs. The author would have been better off citing Iron Tower Studios even though they are unproven. At least they say the right things.
 
fedaykin said:
I agree with the core idea of the article, but the attack on Howard is unnecessary. Although since it's "Angry Gamer", not "Rational and Calm Gamer", I guess it fits their style.

I agree... I dislike how it has become common on the internet to either think everything is the worst ever or the best ever, and to take arguments as far as possible because at worse you get ignored (and get away with it) and but usually it means that people who love controversy or who get offended will post links to it.

That's why it bugs me that the internet is "hits" driven, it leads more to vitriol and controversy over intelligent discussion. For example he is throwing a parade about how Fallout 1/2 indulged any antisocial fantasy he may have had, but 3 allows all those things too except whatever might pertain to minors due to changes in how games are rated. But in terms to dicking people over I think completing a quest by turning in an orphan looking for a new home to slavers, aiding a junky in overdosing or feeding a bunch of ritch snobs to feral ghouls is pretty up there too.

The problem with the whole glittering gems of hatred approach is that it only leads to unproductive yelling matches and peoples "internet personas" drifting further and further from what a real person would act like. It reminds me of a meetup I had with a bunch of RPG.COM people... there was this one guy who was addicted to flaming and posting shocking things and in person he was a terrified little nerd who said 2 things in the entire night.
 
Wonder if Angry Gamer is a front for the RPG Codex. :P
Also wander if it will soon be on the banned words list on the Beth forums like RPG Codex.
 
Alphadrop said:
Wonder if Angry Gamer is a front for the RPG Codex. :P
Also wander if it will soon be on the banned words list on the Beth forums like RPG Codex.

If you listen to their podcast you learn that 2/3 maintainers of angry gamers enjoyed Fallout 3. -K didn't however.
 
Well he certainly is angry. Should have come up with a more creative way to slate Howard if he was going to though.
 
that looks mighty close to arguments i've been internetting about FO3 for quite awhile.

glad people outside the forum-medium are speaking about it.
 
Dionysus said:
I think it's a funny article, but I don't really agree with the Mass Effect criticism. The choices were very limited in that game, but they weren't all black and white. The renegade/paragon distinction was different from the lightside/darkside stuff in KotOR and JE.

LOLWUT? Every choice in Mass Effect was black and white and just as bad as most of the choices in Fallout3.
 
Yeah. How exactly was the renegade/paragon distinction different? It's the same good/evil, black/white thing under a different name.
 
His attack on Todd reminds me a little of the angry rants I sometimes make at Todd and Emil, like them being sucked down a black hole and stretched out into atomic sized spaghetti strands.

That doesn't mean I actually want it to happen, though it would be fascinating to observe it if it really happened but that is another story.

What I am so sick is all the irrational praise of these two people and false modesty, they haven't proved themselves to be good game designers at all, let alone RPG fans, every situation in Fallout 3 so far could be countered with something else or proved to be apparently insignificant not to bother with any consequence.

And when you do say something about it you get loads of attacks of people who feel that its their duty to defend these two person's honor.
 
Alphadrop said:
Wonder if Angry Gamer is a front for the RPG Codex. :P
Also wander if it will soon be on the banned words list on the Beth forums like RPG Codex.

lolwhat? RPG Codex is on the banned words list there?
 
Lexx said:
lolwhat? RPG Codex is on the banned words list there?

Yes. It got on there some time after Oblivion's release. The Codex claims because it is because of its calling out Bethesda's lies and its unfriendly Oblivion review. Bethesda mods claim it is because the site contains children-unfriendly and illegal materials (wares talk, specifically).

And that's that. It's Bethesda forum policy, and it is not allowed to discuss that here. If you're curious, PM someone with inquiries (not me, my memory of the event is hazy).
 
Back
Top