Watch_Dogs 2

CT Phipps

Carbon Dated and Proud
I'm currently playing Watch_Dogs 2 and I'm torn about my feelings for the game. I appreciate the kind of counter-culture swerve the game is promoting but I'm also aware Ubisoft is pretty close to the Blume Corporation, so much so that I fully expected to find out they were a branch of Blume and a branch of Abstergo in the game's history. So, it's a bit hypocritical to be a bunch of Anonymous stand-ins enjoying their franchised coffee and music as they plot to take down the Man.

OTOH, my issues with the game aren't really the protagonists or the world but the gameplay. The constant always online bullshit means that I feel distracted from the single play experience that is woefully underdeveloped and distracted from. The lack of Ubisoft's trademark towers also means that it's a pain in the ass to find everything in the game.

Gameplay and Story Segregation is also an issue because I'm the kind of guy who really does enjoy murdering the shit out of people with guns but Marcus is the sort of guy who acts completely non-violent. Aiden Pierce was an unlikable psychopath with delusions of grandeur but at least you never questioned if he'd really wade into a gang's hideout to slaughter everyone.

San Fransisco is beautiful, though, I'll give them that.

Right now I'm wavering between a 5 and a 6 because the online stuff is intruding on my single player experience way-way too much.
 
Last edited:


Watch_Dogs was a game I really enjoyed but felt had a lot of flaws. I found Aiden Pearce aggressively unlikable and while I believe that was deliberate (see my "The Subversiveness of Aiden Pearce" essay), I believe that didn't contribute to a great gaming experience. I also felt the game suffered for its unwillingness to go full cyberpunk. It felt let down by its attempts to tie itself to the present day and I would have enjoyed a much more overt near-future experience. Despite this, I was still interested in the sequel. I wanted more Aiden Pearce and was looking forward to more hacking of the Blume Corporation.

I was disappointed in the first case because we switch protagonists from Aiden to newcomer Marcus Holloway. Marcus is an aspiring member to San Fransisco's Anonymous/LulzSec stand-in, DedSec. DedSec was nothing more than a set of minor antagonists in the original Watch_Dogs so it was interesting to see them upgraded to protagonists.



It's a beautiful game, I'll give it that.

After being initiated into the organization, Marcus drunkenly suggests the group attack the sinister Blume Corporation. Blume is gathering large amounts of data on the public as well as profiling "at risk" people like Marcus (because he's poor, Black, a hacker, and a gun owner). Inspired by his idea, the group proceeds to start performing "pranks" and cyber attacks against San Fransisco's most repulsive white collar criminals in order to get followers who will lend their computer power to help them take down Blume.

This rather convoluted plot is part of the game's problem as there's not really a clear sense of what DeadSec is attempting to accomplish. Blume Corporation is stealing large amounts of the public's data and profiling people but that's a relatively minor offense compared to the first game's human traffickers. The game also takes you against stand-ins for the Hell's Angels, Zeta Cartel, Church of Scientology, and San Fransisco Tongs but none of them are the main villains. The central villain, Dusan Nemec, just wants to make a large amount of money through white collar crime so I can't bring myself to hate him when our heroes are engaged in hacking as well as robbery.



The likable cast is easily the best part of the game.

Indeed, the game's dissonance in how it can be played versus the story is arguably worse than Nico Bellic's can be if you choose to play in a typical Grand Theft Auto fashion. Despite being angry about being racially profiled and hunted by the police for crimes Marcus didn't commit, it's possible to 3d Print an assault rifle then murder your across San Fransisco with no penalties. This wouldn't be noticeable if not for the fact Aiden Pearce, a much more vicious character, got penalties for killing cops as well as innocents.

The game is also fully optimized for co-op and multiplayer. While you can turn it off, the fact is the game is often full of challenges which require other gamers to play. For those of us who aren't fond of multiplayer, these events distract from the main game even as they do provide experience points for upgrades as well as other tangible benefits to the single player campaign. They're fairly decent adventure hooks like allowing you to hack other players, assault bases, and other fun but nothing to write home about either.



There's a greater emphasis on stealth versus gunplay.

Despite this, there's some elements to write home about. The cast is likable and entertaining with lots of references to geek pop culture as well as genuine camaraderie among the protagonist's gang. Marcus is a fun everyman, Sitara is a pretty but not overly sexualized mastermind, Wrench is pure fun, and Josh is a neuroatypical rationalist. The game is never more entertaining when the characters are just playing off one another and they might have benefited by having you able to play all of the characters rather than just Marcus.

San Fransisco is lovingly rendered with lots of the city's signature landmarks visible throughout. It's colorful, suffering gentrification, and full of interesting NPCs doing oddball things if you watch them. There's also the addition of the fact you can pet dogs scattered throughout the city. Sadly, there's also dogs as enemies and I hated hurting them unlike their punchable masters. The fact the game allows you to complete it without killing anyone also is a bonus, even if I generally prefer creating a body count in four figures. You also get a remote controlled drone and toy car which add to the diversity of the game play even if it makes me feel like Marcus is less mature than he should be for his quixotic quest.



I think I dated Sitara in college.

Really, I think the game's biggest flaw is it never quite embraces the sense of wackiness inherent to the story. The San Fransisco branch of DeadSec is just shy of being as entertaining as the cast of Saints Row. However, the only plot which is anywhere near as crazy as they have the potential of being is when they steal a stand-in for Knight Rider's KITT before running it in an obstacle course to Judas Priest's "Turbo Lover." If the game had been either darker or completely goofy, I would have liked it a lot more.

One thing I will give the game credit for is that it embraces the 21st century cyberpunk mentality of sticking it to the Man through technology even as the Man is sticking it to the public the same way. The villains all hide behind layers of bureaucracy and the system in order to profit from the misery of those least able to defend themselves. The protagonists may be too sanctimonious about their criminal activities to be truly punk but the fact the game gleefully shows them striking out warmed my cynical Generation X heart.



Curse you and your adorableness!

The characters make the game entertaining but like Mafia III, there's nothing which stands out either and it swiftly falls into a rut of SWATing (sending the police to arrest guards) every level. Like Mafia III, it also has quite a few bugs which crashed my game or caused the graphics to fail. These bugs are to be expected from an Ubisoft game but, combined with the long loading times, swiftly dropped my enjoyment factor.

Watch_Dogs 2 is an okay game. I actually prefer the original, overall, because it was dark and moody present-day cyberpunk. Here, it feels like the game is far light-hearted to get into without a plot you can sink your teeth into. The game's villains are just too squeaky clean and the protagonists the same way. If they'd been a bit more low life to go with their high tech, I would have enjoyed this game a lot more. Say what you will about Aiden Pearce but at least you believed he was a guy capable of killing someone.

6.5/10
 
Last edited:
Does it really have a worse technical aspect than GTAV ?
 
Well, Grand Theft Auto V never really ran into any problems on my Xbox One console. By contrast, I've had:

* A couple of crashes
* Clipping
* Crowds not loading when you're flying through the city.
* A wonky interface as you have to use your in-universe cellphone aps to do everything
* A control scheme which takes quite a bit of time to master versus the relative GTA-perfect one from the original game.

It's not awful but it's not great either.
 
Sometimes I feel weird for not being able to enjoy all these modern freeroam open-world games, honestly they bore me to death.
The "Make your OWN fun!" attitude from devs, both Ubi, Rockstar and most AAA Studios is a bad habit IMO and it shoots in the leg proper game design.
Yeah, it prolongs virtually forever the playtime as "faffing about" is what takes most of it, but that's not necesarily good. An apple lasts virtually forever by only licking it, but it's gonna get sticky and smell weird after a while.

And are there still the crazy minigames? That mech-spider one was a better game than the one it was in lol

> Still nothing 'bout Souls nor here nor in your blog
:naughty:
 
You found him unlikeable but wanted to see more of him?

He's a mean, growly anti-hero but that didn't mean he was unsalvagable. I was hoping, basically, for a rescue of his character and some development along his story versus abandoning him altogether. Certainly, he had a potential arc to go through where he realizes how horrible a person he'd been.

I wrote this essay: The Subversiveness of Aiden Pearce

I like the concept of Watch Dogs but I've seen enough videos of the first game's problems to put me off trying any of them.

I feel horrible about doing this...

http://unitedfederationofcharles.blogspot.com/2015/08/watchdogs-review.html

I gave it an 8/10

:D
 
I played the Demo, it's okay so far, but if I wanted to play GTA, I'll just play GTA.
 
Mostly crap with a slice of fun? *shrugs*

No, no, clearly 8/10 means a festering pile of horror!

No, Watch Dogs 2 is something....darker.

WHH3h5rl_400x400.jpeg
 
Eh, Watch_Dogs is a GTA knock off rather than an Assassins Creed one.

I also prefer anything with a hint of social consciousness and cyberpunk to most games.

This was just literally hard to play due to the controls, co-op intrusions, and glitches.
 
Eh, Watch_Dogs is a GTA knock off rather than an Assassins Creed one.

I also prefer anything with a hint of social consciousness and cyberpunk to most games.

This was just literally hard to play due to the controls, co-op intrusions, and glitches.

Its all the same. Open world nonsense with a shit ton of busywork.
 
Back
Top