Search results

TBH you'd be much better off simply starting out with another engine than bethesdas. There's no real reason to develop for bethesdas engine because of all the limits it imposes. And there's no reason, especially, because the majority of the features it offers aren't interesting for people who...

Quote from Garlic: " ICBMs don't have to have nuclear payloads and the first ones didn't (Germany invented them [V1 and V2]) " What DSJ said ^^ As I recall, the launch of Sputnik ushered in the era of ICBM's - there were probably at least prototypes that could be classified as ICBMs a...

Point taken...by 2070, there might be a delivery mechanism that could make really long range ballistic missilies viable for use with munitions other than strategic nukes. That would completely void the need for air supperiority.

You called a bad assumption on my part - thanks! That changes the picture somewhat. I still do see the use for a bigass explosive in a small package, but if regular explosives are as potent as the FOAB you mention, a 30 pound bomb could pack probably 100 kg of TNT equivalent by 2070... In...

UncannyGarlic: Perhaps only a small amount of uranium was necessary by this point. Perhaps the capacitor technology had advanced to the point that plutonium was a viable nuclear weapon. Or, perhaps maintaining a production of 2+ ton cruise missiles, as well as maintenence crew and training...

Sorry for going on about the fat man in the mirv thread...I haven't seen it in use...I should probably youtube it. But it does seem pretty...easter-egg-y. Now for some somewhat more serious replies: ShatteredJon Nukes aren’t the only thing that makes would-be mushroom clouds…this is...

Heheh well sorry for not witnessing the prior cycles, since I went here just to see what the good folk of NMA were thinking about this. I tried reading through some of the old debates, but the ones I found focus on people who are worried about the gameplay and fiction vs. people posing with a...