Search results

I assume it contains the same stuff that is in every med kit in every game ever.

After Fallout 3 failed to give people their childhoods back, New Vegas made the unforgivable mistake of also not giving people their childhoods back.

Whew, and here I was afraid we wouldn't get the Final Word in this thread. :roll:

Why is it bad? What is a Numermeanwhatsit? Why does it have Tides? Call the sucker "Torment" and be done with it.

LR is littered with AMR's so I'd get one of those in good condition. Really though a .308 with AP rounds has always been sufficient in my experience, as long as you get headshots. Fighting them up close is never advisable but if you have an LMG or Assault Carbine with AP rounds you can...

I'd be happy with another Tactics game to be honest. A COH style game could be fun, but we'd lose much of what makes Fallout great - characters and personality. RTS games, with the endless cranking out of units, lose that. Tactics got it about half right, I'd say. It would be nice to have...

Manhattan would be tough to beat if you are talking east coast. Back west, I'd love to see a return to the LA area. As a midwesterner, I feel the midwest would be relatively boring in a Fallout game.

I've played through with Project Nevada and it didn't seem to make all that much of a difference. I'd still recommend it, but I was slightly disappointed. New gear was nice.

I understand with your sentiment here, but there is a point where the technology reaches some of plateau that keeps it looking acceptable for the duration. The Bards' Tale games, or Wasteland, or really any game made up until 1995, looks too old for me to enjoy, despite the fact that I...

Isometric is pretty pointless unless you have a game that requires team management. I can't really understand anyone wanting it back, unless it's for the nostalgia or whatever. With Diablo 3 it made sense, as it allowed the devs more time to work on the story and the real money auction house.

There never needs to another game like Diablo 3, ever.

The other games had effective stories. In the first, you were hunting Diablo. Simple but effective. After all, we hadn't seen Diablo before. The world was fleshed out by the books, and it was moderately interesting. In the second you were tracking the guy from the first, again, simple but...

Forget the account hacking issues, I'd be thrilled if that was the only problem. The game itself sucks ass. I was far from a fanatic but I did enjoy the previous games. The stories were fun, there was at least a little character building, and the chance of finding a better bit of loot kept me...

Granted I've only played Fallout DLC, but I think I prefer that release model to expansion packs. The format just makes more sense. It gives the devs (and the consumers) more options, and in the case of add-ons I think that several smaller additional adventures beats one long additional...

sad news but yeah, good to see people are still taking the chance to slag Fallout 3.

I've always thought the USSR would have made a better choice for the US enemy than China. Fits in more with the motif. Plus, cyrillic writing just screams post apocalypse. My Fallout would have had the war in the 1960's instead and the game itself would take place roughly in the present day...

Red Alert 2 looked more or less like that screenshot. It was a sharp looking game. Many 3D games feel a bit devoid of personality compared to an expertly rendered 2D game of old, such as RA2 or BG2. I mean, compare NWN with BG2 or Planescape. It's just so plain. Look at the maps in...

Is that C&C 2? Ugh. That one sucked.

Red Alert is great. It lacks some of the flair of the second one, and you might be surprised at the relatively somber tone it has. I prefer the second one because of the batshit craziness, original units, and sweet ass cutscenes, but the original is a classic for sure.

Cool looking but too needlessly monsterish for Fallout, IMO