Bit-Tech.net: Fallout should be remastered?

Brother None

This ghoul has seen it all
Orderite
bit-tech.net has done an article on games that should be remastered. Fallout pops up:<blockquote>The genre of RPGs was never so well expanded as it was with the release of Black Isle and Interplay's Fallout. This tile-based RPG won incredible critical acclaim at the time of its 1997 release, but has really shown its age since.

Set in "near" future after a nuclear holocaust, the game had a storyline that truly bent the normal concept of an RPG. The premise of the story involves your character being in charge of the water recycling of a fallout shelter (called a "vault"), and needing to repair the chip that controls the process. If you fail to do so within the allotted time, the people in your vault will die of thirst. So, armed with your trusty PDA and a few pitiful supplies, you set off to fix the chip.

Along the way, you are introduced to an entire post-apocalyptic world of warring vaults, bandit raiders, mutated monsters and hazardous conditions. The well-written story makes you almost forget the urgency of your recycling debacle as the plot's concepts get bigger and bigger, eventually involving an entire mutant army.

As original and involving as the game is, its isometric, tile-based graphics are a bit hard on the eyes. Furthermore, the game could greatly use the boost of some in-game cinematics, which would definitely help pull you into the rather unusual story a bit more. It would be great to see this get a new coat of paint rather than the promise of another sequel.</blockquote>Hmmm. What would you guys rather see, a new coat of paint on Fallout or (the promise of) another sequel?

Link: Games that should be remastered on Bit-Tech.net
 
Hmmm. What would you guys rather see, a new coat of paint on Fallout or (the promise of) another sequel?

A good sequel would be great. As awesome as F1 is one simply cannot get that same feeling they did when they first started it, a new game with the right atmosphere and a dandy plot would pwn.
 
Forgetting the (small) mistakes in the text, yeah, I'd rather a revamped FO1 than a crappy FO3.


That "more cinematics" idea is kinda iffy, tho'. I think Fallout told it's story well enough with a limited number of non-interactible cinematics.
 
Jabberwocky said:
What would you guys rather see, a new coat of paint on Fallout or (the promise of) another sequel?
I would like to see an open-sourced Fallout-like engine that allows to play and mod both Fallout and Fallout 2.
A Fallout remake with things that were cut out due to time constrains would be nice too...
 
a good sequel > a new coat of paint > a bad sequel.

obviously :)

if one game has the right to be remastered it really is FO in my opinion. bugfree, better graphics, tiny gameplay fixes, made extremely modable for the community. that'd be the bomb!

but there is a problem to that as well: as soon as you touch the graphics and start making gameplay fixes, it's likely not everyone will be happy with the result. for some, it simply wont be fallout...
 
I´d like to see a remastered FO 1 with an open engine (lets say FIFE *g*).

Changes or improvements can then be made by the community itself. TASpring lead the way..
 
I just have to nitpick a little:

Those people said:
The premise of the story involves your character being in charge of the water recycling

What?

warring vaults

What?

The well-written story makes you almost forget the urgency of your recycling debacle as the plot's concepts get bigger and bigger, eventually involving an entire mutant army.

Um, yes, that is the one "plot development" in the game. I don't know why people keep talking about a written story or plot in Fallout. The emergent story is the choices you make during your journeys and the impact they have on your surroundings. The game was made that way on purpose.
 
A fresh coat of paint could be nice, however, I'd want that in the hands of capable people, not someone unfamiliar with the franchise
 
SuAside said:
but there is a problem to that as well: as soon as you touch the graphics and start making gameplay fixes, it's likely not everyone will be happy with the result. for some, it simply wont be fallout...

Just running FO in high res makes a massive difference to the sprite bassed graphics. High res would be awesome.

chewie said:
I´d like to see a remastered FO 1 with an open engine (lets say FIFE *g*).

Changes or improvements can then be made by the community itself. TASpring lead the way..

yea, if the whole FO community really got together on this and backed up a project like FIFE it could become a real great thing
 
DirtyDreamDesigner said:
Forgetting the (small) mistakes in the text, yeah, I'd rather a revamped FO1 than a crappy FO3.


That "more cinematics" idea is kinda iffy, tho'. I think Fallout told it's story well enough with a limited number of non-interactible cinematics.

I agree.

A redesigned Fallout 1 [by capable hands] would be leagues above the crapterpeice called Fallout 3 currently being excreted by Bethesda at the moment. :?
 
God?

What if God got his hand into and actually saved Bethesda from eternal damnation and helped them make a good Fallout 3? anyone? God? no?
 
Something tells me that game making is at the low tier of Divine Intervention priorities.
 
Re: God?

Goweigus said:
What if God got his hand into and actually saved Bethesda from eternal damnation and helped them make a good Fallout 3? anyone? God? no?

Who's God? Does he have an infinite amount of charisma and money?
 
Re: God?

Goweigus said:
What if God got his hand into and actually saved Bethesda from eternal damnation and helped them make a good Fallout 3? anyone? God? no?

I'd buy it even if just to piss off the evangelicals.
 
I'd love to see FO1 with more talking heads and hi-res graphics. In-game cinematics I couldn't care less about.
 
ok well...

What if Satan intervened to make it cool because of its potential to be so damn violent and bloody and its wonderful ability to make parents and activists squirm? Maybe we can count on Satan to help?
 
Re: ok well...

Goweigus said:
What if Satan intervened to make it cool because of its potential to be so damn violent and bloody and its wonderful ability to make parents and activists squirm? Maybe we can count on Satan to help?

I don't think they'll even be able to pronounce "Fallout" much less throw a campaign against it and the violence portrayed in it. Plus, their kids (parents) have no chance in the world of understanding the game, and therefore would quit within 15 minutes. Kids don't play it, parents don't see it, activists don't speak of it. That's just Fallout. Natural rating enforcement.
 
Re: ok well...

DarkLegacy said:
I don't think they'll even be able to pronounce "Fallout" much less throw a campaign against it and the violence portrayed in it. Plus, their kids (parents) have no chance in the world of understanding the game, and therefore would quit within 15 minutes. Kids don't play it, parents don't see it, activists don't speak of it. That's just Fallout. Natural rating enforcement.

Fallout. Rating: Not For The Stupid.
 
Well

It'd be really cool to play Fallout in new graphics. I see no reason why Bethesda or anyone cant make a great Fallout game in Turn-based combat with next-gen (or current) graphics ( though their excuse would probably be something like "Well thats just not the way we do things, we wanted to make a cRPG Fallout with similar combat to Oblivion). it'd be allot like Silent Storm (someone has mentioned this before) or even Final Fantasy has run on turn-based. The big difference would be we'd be blowing peoples brains out with guns before they even got heir turn :P Maybe even sneak some cinematic killing action (also ike someone mentioned before). Itd be cool.... k enough rambling on my part.... (sry if this is straying a bit off topic)
 
Back
Top