I love you.He's a hypocrite in terms of pissing on Leafy, but at the same time, he's done just the same shit, but ohhh no, his method of roasting is perfectly fine!
I love you.He's a hypocrite in terms of pissing on Leafy, but at the same time, he's done just the same shit, but ohhh no, his method of roasting is perfectly fine!
<3I love you.
I was really annoyed at h3h3's video on leafy and how he acted like some kind of moral crusader and like this "community" of totally separate dumbasses on youtube and their fans were responsible to police leafy's content. Like, look, I don't like leafy at all. I saw one of his video once and it was unfunny and cringy but I really don't give a shit if he makes fun of some retard on the internet. It's the internet, if you didn't want to get made fun of don't post videos of yourself. I also was annoyed that apparently the guy was too autistic to criticize but not too autistic to be raking in patreon money and hebrew3hebrew3 started talking about how he doesn't make fun of people like that despite having multiple videos of him ripping on kids. He just came across as a hypocrite on some self righteous high horse.<3
Seriously, though, h3h3, Pyrocynical, leafy, the whole nine yards of these types of idiots should be ashamed of calling themselves "Comedy" channels, because all they fucking do is either the same shtick for months (commentary and poorly-done roasting) until something 'ehhh' comes into play, as a method to kickstart that attention-span engine in their fans or audience in general OR they do something unique, but quickly go into the apologetic stance and tiptoe on fucking eggshells or getting fussy on groups because "BUH MUH PULITIKZ". Should just go with the George Carlin viewpoint and just simply not give a shit. If they cannot take a joke, then they're not worth the time and effort to talk to.
When was that?I remember when police brutality wasn't treated as a racial issue.
I remember when police brutality wasn't treated as a racial issue. People were mostly rational and talked about how the assumption of that everyone has a gun is the main issue (the 2nd amendment). People tell me that I shouldn't care because the issue is being addressed. However I can't accept the immoral becoming moral. That is stain in society that can't be easily washed off.
This Asian-American woman makes her live matter alright! Three burglars invaded her house, she gunned them down. One fucker killed, two other just shat their pants and ran away:I am waiting for an Asian-American protest titled Yellow Lives Matter.
You are mistaking one statistic for another. Just because a low amount of the guns in America are used in shootings doesn't mean they're not effective. Do some more research before you spout BS. I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to find statistics on the fatality of shootings. I'm not saying guns should be banned, in fact, I agree with some of what you said. Handguns are mostly designed with killing humans in mind. I support self defense, but don't twist the truth to your agenda.If you think the second amendment is the problem you have a few screws loose too. Violent people will do what they want if they have a gun or not. Putting a gun in someone's hand does not make them do any of these things. Maybe people should look at their own actions and culture that influences them. I am completely sure that listening to people glorify rape, robbery, and murder for respect has not influenced how these people react. How about being raised in a household where they were told not to trust police. Or you know being raised in households without proper role models for one reason or another. Maybe people in low income situations should stop pumping out kids making their situation worse.
Don't blame an inanimate object for the choice a person makes. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Now for some math. Estimated 300 million firearms in the states, around 120,000 firearms related incidents (suicide, death, and injury) so:
120000/3000000= 0.04
This means that firearms are used correctly 99.96% of the time. Would you ban any other item that had that success rate. But wait you might say that guns are designed for killing people. Well if that is the case the are pretty horrible at it with a success rate of them being only 0.04%.
A person makes that choice to pull a gun on the cops, a person makes a choice to punch a cop in the head. I have a feeling that 90% of these people would still be alive if they just listened to the cops and didn't think they would be able to somehow get away. Also its not police brutality when you attack the cop first.
You are mistaking one statistic for another. Just because a low amount of the guns in America are used in shootings doesn't mean they're not effective. Do some more research before you spout BS. I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to find statistics on the fatality of shootings. I'm not saying guns should be banned, in fact, I agree with some of what you said. Handguns are mostly designed with killing humans in mind. I support self defense, but don't twist the truth to your agenda.
Wow really makes you think. ;^)
There's no dot to mark whether its a six or nine so clearly its a g. Ffs people.
It's not even a character, it's a thing on top of the soda can you tip to open the said can.There's no dot to mark whether its a six or nine so clearly its a g. Ffs people.
Whoever wrote this likes useless commas even more than I do.
Maybe, he's, a, native, russain, speaker? Grammar provides a comma rule for almost every wordfart combination, for real.Whoever wrote this likes useless commas even more than I do.
I just assumed it was made by a Facebook shitposter or something.Maybe, he's, a, native, russain, speaker? Grammar provides a comma rule for almost every wordfart combination, for real.
Just tryin' to be positive here. It never works well enough but whatever.I just assumed it was a Facebook shitposter or something who made it.
I don't necessarily think that. I'm just saying that police are not necessarily paranoid to act like everyone has a gun.If you think the second amendment is the problem
When people were tackling the issue of corruption instead looting cities and blaming the police.When was that?
That would be the.... Tab. Right? Anyhow, no its a g. Becaue coke tabs are more like eights than g's.It's not even a character, it's a thing on top of the soda can you tip to open the said can.