To make matters worse, a lot of people are eating his shit up instead of looking for the lore themselves and think for themselves. And then when you have arguments with Bethestards (bad idea but it happens) people think the lore in the new games is great because of his walls of text are filled with a lot bullshit justifications and self-interpreted crap.
It's not like he's wrong, though. But having to overanalyze and add tons of headcanon so your world makes sense is just lazy, shitty writing.
I read some of his stuff and it had a lot of self-interpreted stuff, meaning there were no actual ingame sources to validate the claims he makes. So while he's not completely wrong, he's wrong about a lot of stuff because of lack of actual evidence.
That is the thing. These shyster fucks know well enough to use vague lore in key areas to make nerds geek out over future possibilities. 6 DLC are planned. The fucking engine is easily hacked, and unencrypted data is sent through plain word files. DDOS attacks are highly likely.
That's the supposed "plothole." As Walpknut said,
If Bethesda decides that something more exciting should happen during times not mentioned in great detail, then it's obviously the better option
Well, the idea started with Gene Roddenberry and was further explored by William Shatner, so there's bound to be some fan obsession over that even if canonicity is extremely questionable.
Nah, it's going to come back even angrier now.
