Not really. A lot of people there like it that way. I'm gonna put a poll there to see what they think about it.Reconite said:There's a lot of good news here, but I can tell the "perk every 2 levels" thing will be out as soon as the Bethesda kids start complaining.
Blackened said:WTF is with that poisonous creature!? You die when you are bitten (like in real life)
aenemic said:you don't die from getting stung by the tarantula hawk wasp. but after reading on the subject, I can imagine that you wish you had.
He was talking about the tarantula hawk which evolves into the Cazador.Blackened said:aenemic said:you don't die from getting stung by the tarantula hawk wasp. but after reading on the subject, I can imagine that you wish you had.
"Their poison is deadly" - from this article.
Where did you read about this?
OakTable said:He was talking about the tarantula hawk which evolves into the Cazador.
TaapLuup said:I'm trying not to get too hyped up about F:NV but it sounds like they are fixing almost all the problems I had with part 3 as well as adding in some cool new featires (the SPECIAL overhaul is my top pick)
Ausir said:Not console players, though, who are the majority.
Don't forget the incredibly OP Intense Training.Reconite said:A lot of the early ones were just boosts to repair/small guns and etc.
IMissLark said:Ausir said:Not console players, though, who are the majority.
I will shed buckets of tears for them.
Basically, the perk levelling ultimately means nothing if the perks suck. If they continue to be bland and nothing but stat boosts, then they might as well have them every 2, 3, or 4 levels.