The Final Virus

Sander

This ghoul has seen it all
Staff member
Admin
Orderite
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/final-virus.html

Special to TechNewsNet, July 2005 -- Millions of Microsoft users woke up to a new and deadlier Blue Screen of Death this morning. It said "This is the Final Virus. For spam to end, Windows must die!". Rebooting got them nowhere, because their hard drives had been formatted. All their data was destroyed.

A bulletin from CERT, the Computer Emergency Readiness Team chartered by the U.S. government, advised all Windows users to take their machines off the Internet immediately. "Final is polymorphic, so normal virus scanners don't spot it. Final spreads via infected Web pages, UPnP, the Microsoft Upgrade Channel, the Microsoft Messenger service, and possibly other routes," says the bulletin. Final seems to be written to do IP port scans and infect a fixed number of other machines before destroying its host. Infection reports have been rising exponentially since Final was first reported four days ago.

In a possibly related development, ISPs reported that the volume of spam detected at their servers has dropped between 2% and 10% since Final first appeared -- the first such drop in memory. Most spam is sent by zombie networks of cracked Windows machines; as more succumb to the virus or are pulled off-net, spam volume is expected to drop further.

But at least one company isn't taking Final's death notice at face value. A Microsoft spokesman hinted that the open-source community might be behind the attack. "You've got to ask yourself: who benefits?" said Craig Mundie. "And then you have to look at Linux." Microsoft's IE web browser has been losing market share to open-source Firefox since CERT's bulletin on the BHO vulnerability early last year. Linux's market share in new server installations passed Microsoft's in 1Q2005, continuing a trend begun in 1Q2004 when Linux posted 57% gains to a full quarter of Microsoft's share. Two quarters of disappointing earnings reports this year have the company under pressure from analysts.

But "I don't think this is us," said Eric Raymond, president of the Open Source Initiative. "Why would any of us perform a criminal attack on Microsoft's users when we're winning them over fair and square? Actually, this is very bad news for us; it might get INDUCE II passed."

Yesterday Senator Orrin Hatch issued a statement that Final highlights the need to make so-called "Digital Rights Management" hardware mandatory on all new computers. INDUCE II is backed by Microsoft, the Motion Picture Industry of America, and other anti-open-source groups; it would require software to have a cryptographic signature issued by a Federal security-certification authority before it could run on new hardware, and make circumvention of a computer's onboard DRM a felony offense.

Washington insiders are saying that in the wake of the damage wrought by Final, INDUCE II could be reported out of committee as early as next week.


The frightening thing about this story is how very little of it is fiction.

According to the ISPs who monitor these things, more than 80% of all Internet traffic is now spam, with the percentage still rising. And gone are the halcyon days when that spam was mostly porn-site solicitations and pyramid schemes; nowadays, most of it is either attempts to propagate viruses or bounce messages from failed attempts. Those viruses, in turn, are nowadays primarily designed to crack Windows machines and turn them into spam-sending zombies. Email users are in imminent danger of drowning in a flood of garbage; the spam and virus problems have become inextricably intertwined.

And, in fact, the underlying technical problem is the incurable insecurity of Microsoft Windows. Crackers and spammer gangs are now finding exploits faster than Microsoft can patch them; the help-object hole in IE, which can silently zombify any machine that visits an infected webpage, is only the most notorious of the recent vulnerabilities.

Final would be an extremely simple virus to write. We haven't seen it yet, because up to now virus writers have wanted to capture and exploit Windows machines, not exterminate them. But all it would take is one programmer. The virus-writing toolkits to produce such a beast are already out there.

Though Linux passed Microsoft in web-server market share long ago, it remains second in overall share for intranet and general-purpose servers. But unless there is some break in the trend curves Linux really will be #1 around the beginning of 2005. Microsoft is already bracing for it; in a recent memo. Steve Ballmer announced a billion-dollar cut in employee benefits and other expenses.

INDUCE II doesn't exist, but INDUCE I already does and Orrin Hatch is its sponsor. Similar proposals have been floated before. Intel is already shipping NX hardware that requires a cryptographic signature before binaries will run.

I don't know how to keep this future from happening. The inertia of that huge mass of Windows users out there makes it very unlikely that we can convert everyone voluntarily before some fed-up, spam-victimized programmer decides to force the issue.

We'd better hope we find a way, though. If this is how Windows dies, it could very well take us down with it.


____________________________
Now that was an interesting bit of fiction. The fact is that this could very well become reality, there have already been several viruses out there that were intended to bring down windows PCs and that claimed to be windows haters. If this scenario were to unfold, we'd all either be fucked, or we'd have to be on a non-windows system.
 
Hmm I wonder what company will first announce that it has an antidote for this Final Virus? .....
As for the spam.... We've talked about this already... if you are carefull you can stay clean... if not that's your fault.
 
Actually, that's not true. And that's not the point either. You get spam if you put your e-mail on the net, and I'm still wondering how long those spam bots will take to pick up on the AT DOT and <no-spam> diversions. A lot of people out there post their e-mail addresses on the internet because they need to be reached, businesses cannot go with the AT DOT or <no-spam> alternatives, because most people don't have a clue what that means. That also means that a lot of businesses will be on a lot of spam-lists. The same goes for most people with websites.

However, that wasn't the point of the fiction. The point of the fiction was that practically all spam now comes from zombified WIndows machines, windows machines that have become zombified because of careless use, bad coding on microsoft's side or a combination of the two. Now ask yourself how long it will take before someone gets so pissed off at windows and the spam originating from it that they write a virus like that? It certainly wouldn't be impossible, and there have already been tries....
 
Ha! Another doomsday scenario, reminds me of previous fears about nuclear war. Does it strike that cord in anyone else?

Also believe it is somewhat unfounded. It's not quite that easy to sow mass destruction (not saying it's impossible, but it would take hard work and some amount of luck). That piece of fiction is exaggerating the situation precisely to incite fear. It's propaganda.
 
Also believe it is somewhat unfounded. It's not quite that easy to sow mass destruction (not saying it's impossible, but it would take hard work and some amount of luck). That piece of fiction is exaggerating the situation precisely to incite fear. It's propaganda.
Actually, no. If you'd read more articles by that man, you'd know it wasn't, and you'd know why. He's the president of the Open Source Initiative and a highly valued person within the Open Source community. Furthermore he's active in various legal and other battles against Microsoft and other corporations, but he's never used propaganda. Propaganda is always unfounded or heavily exaggerated, if it is factual it isn't really propaganda. And this isn't propaganda because it has factually solid grounds. Read the last bit as well, will you? He says, and I quote,
The frightening thing about this story is how very little of it is fiction.

According to the ISPs who monitor these things, more than 80% of all Internet traffic is now spam, with the percentage still rising. And gone are the halcyon days when that spam was mostly porn-site solicitations and pyramid schemes; nowadays, most of it is either attempts to propagate viruses or bounce messages from failed attempts. Those viruses, in turn, are nowadays primarily designed to crack Windows machines and turn them into spam-sending zombies. Email users are in imminent danger of drowning in a flood of garbage; the spam and virus problems have become inextricably intertwined.

And, in fact, the underlying technical problem is the incurable insecurity of Microsoft Windows. Crackers and spammer gangs are now finding exploits faster than Microsoft can patch them; the help-object hole in IE, which can silently zombify any machine that visits an infected webpage, is only the most notorious of the recent vulnerabilities.

Final would be an extremely simple virus to write. We haven't seen it yet, because up to now virus writers have wanted to capture and exploit Windows machines, not exterminate them. But all it would take is one programmer. The virus-writing toolkits to produce such a beast are already out there.

Though Linux passed Microsoft in web-server market share long ago, it remains second in overall share for intranet and general-purpose servers. But unless there is some break in the trend curves Linux really will be #1 around the beginning of 2005. Microsoft is already bracing for it; in a recent memo. Steve Ballmer announced a billion-dollar cut in employee benefits and other expenses.

INDUCE II doesn't exist, but INDUCE I already does and Orrin Hatch is its sponsor. Similar proposals have been floated before. Intel is already shipping NX hardware that requires a cryptographic signature before binaries will run.

I don't know how to keep this future from happening. The inertia of that huge mass of Windows users out there makes it very unlikely that we can convert everyone voluntarily before some fed-up, spam-victimized programmer decides to force the issue.

We'd better hope we find a way, though. If this is how Windows dies, it could very well take us down with it.
These are mainly facts. Most spam IS originating from Windows machines, crackers ARE finding security holes faster than Microsoft patches them, there have already been several anti-microsoft viruses and worms, and the virus would not be that hard to write. The people who secure their computers and are careful with what they do wouldn't have much troubles; the fact that I've never had a virus, except once due to my sister's actions, should speak for itself. But the fact remains that most people do NOT have a firewall running, do NOT have a virusscanner running and DO have an unpatched or otherwise insecure version of windows. Furthermore, there is already an impulse from the major companies towards something like INDUCE II( the writer mentions it), which would turn all hardware into useless bits of hardware if it didn't have the right software on it, making open source and downloads useless. The point of this story is that it is based in reality, even though it has been (slightly) exaggerated. The writer mentions that as well.
 
*Ahem* From my favorite dictionary:

prop-a-gan-da n. 1. The systematic propagation of a given doctrine or of allegations reflecting its views and interests. 2. Material disseminated by the proselytizers of a doctrine.

This seems to fit that description well enough. He doesn't seek to spread Open Source? That's a rather strange thing to say about someone who is president of the Open Source Initiative.

As for the second part, I really don't see how those facts make a doomsday scenario an inevitability. Much like nuclear war actually.

Is he not playing on fear to spread his own beliefs? Because that is exactly what that man is doing in this article.
 
*Ahem* From my favorite dictionary:

prop-a-gan-da n. 1. The systematic propagation of a given doctrine or of allegations reflecting its views and interests. 2. Material disseminated by the proselytizers of a doctrine.

This seems to fit that description well enough. He doesn't seek to spread Open Source? That's a rather strange thing to say about someone who is president of the Open Source Initiative.
Hmm.. Okay, true enough. I usually took propaganda to be misleading or lying, though. *shrugs* That's the connotation it has, anyway.
As for the second part, I really don't see how those facts make a doomsday scenario an inevitability. Much like nuclear war actually.
And he isn't saying it is. Read it again.

Is he not playing on fear to spread his own beliefs? Because that is exactly what that man is doing in this article.
Ahem. You post this way too negatively, and without distinction. There is a difference between playing on fears and telling the truth/warning people. Playing on fear means that you are consciously misleading people to try to reach your own goal by making them believe that things are worse than they really are. Telling people the truth and warning them is completely different, because this involves not misleading them and showing them a valid possibility.

Of course, it seems you're convinced that this is propaganda. I'd like to see what is false or misleading about this article.
Note also that basically only people that already use open source take this seriously. As a propaganda tool it is rather weak.
 
windows being leaky & virusses being bad is old news...

however this is what scares me: TCPA (Trusted Computing Platform Alliance)

<- clicky clicky
 
Likewise you seem convinced that this man is selflessly "warning" us.

I would recommend that you take a look at certain parts of the article, particularly the second part, which you seem very fond of telling me to "read again."

Final would be an extremely simple virus to write. We haven't seen it yet, because up to now virus writers have wanted to capture and exploit Windows machines, not exterminate them. But all it would take is one programmer. The virus-writing toolkits to produce such a beast are already out there.
...
I don't know how to keep this future from happening. The inertia of that huge mass of Windows users out there makes it very unlikely that we can convert everyone voluntarily before some fed-up, spam-victimized programmer decides to force the issue.

That doesn't support the conclusions that the Doomsday virus is an inevitability? Please explain (in all politeness), he has lined up the evidence to lead to the fact that the Doomsday virus is an immediate and unavoidable threat, I really don't see how you suggest otherwise.

He's exaggerating, perhaps not on purpose (he could honestly believe what he is saying, living in fear and so forth), but I really don't see how you can deny that he is exaggerating the situation. Which then leads back down the propaganda road.

The inertia of that huge mass of Windows users out there makes it very unlikely that we can convert everyone voluntarily before some fed-up, spam-victimized programmer decides to force the issue.

We'd better hope we find a way, though. If this is how Windows dies, it could very well take us down with it.

Insinuating that a Doomsday virus would take down both all Open Source software and Windows is a weak propaganda tool? Read those two sentences, he wants people to convert, and suggests that it is the only way to prevent a Doomsday virus. Which I also believe is a faulty assumption, but that's another topic.
 
Likewise you seem convinced that this man is selflessly "warning" us.

I would recommend that you take a look at certain parts of the article, particularly the second part, which you seem very fond of telling me to "read again."
Note, please, that I'd given you an answer as to why I thought that he wasn't spouting propaganda. And you never fully explained why this wasn't just normal.

That doesn't support the conclusions that the Doomsday virus is an inevitability? Please explain (in all politeness), he has lined up the evidence to lead to the fact that the Doomsday virus is an immediate and unavoidable threat, I really don't see how you suggest otherwise.
1) As he said, it needs the actions of an individual to cause this. As you can also see from that bit of text, it is directed at Linux users, meaning that it isn't just propaganda. I quote "
The inertia of that huge mass of Windows users out there makes it very unlikely that we can convert everyone voluntarily before some fed-up, spam-victimized programmer decides to force the issue. "
2) He never claimed it to be immediate either. It's a warning, and a realistic one.
I'm not denying the fact that he's claiming that this is a serious danger, something with which I don't completely agree, but you seem to be denying the entire possibility of it happening. Tell me which one is more reasonable? Because I haven't seen a single argument leading to a conclusion that this can't happen.

He's exaggerating, perhaps not on purpose (he could honestly believe what he is saying, living in fear and so forth), but I really don't see how you can deny that he is exaggerating the situation. Which then leads back down the propaganda road.
Ahem. He is exaggerating the situation, I believe he states this. He also states that most of it could very well become reality. As you showed, this is propaganda. But this is truthful propaganda.

Insinuating that a Doomsday virus would take down both all Open Source software and Windows is a weak propaganda tool?
No, it's a weak propaganda tool because its aimed at his own church. Preaching to the choir is what it's called.
Read those two sentences, he wants people to convert, and suggests that it is the only way to prevent a Doomsday virus. Which I also believe is a faulty assumption, but that's another topic.
Agreed.
 
Of course, everybody should convert to an operating system where you still have to have Windows on your hard drive to actually do anything.
 
Read those two sentences, he wants people to convert, and suggests that it is the only way to prevent a Doomsday virus. Which I also believe is a faulty assumption, but that's another topic.
Agreed.

It depends on your definition of "Doomsday" in this case. If you mean "wipe out all life on Earth" or "Causes a *major* loss of life" then no, probably never will happen and the next generation of the windows operating system *should* be a lot more secure. However if you mean taking out large networks in homes, businesses and government computers and cause large financial damage then too late.
 
I think the collapse of the financial world would qualify as a precedent to a doomsday scenario.

And if not that, then its definitely the doom of the modern world.
 
Okay Sander, well, obviously enough we have opposing viewpoints. Seems like we understand each other now, and are as much in agreement over the article as we are ever going to be.

Err... the use of "Doomsday Virus" was solely mine. I actually used the moniker ironically, to coincide with what I believe to be the message of the original article.
 
Fools!!!!!

You don't even imagine the real EVIL that is producing these little cursed creatures that infest your computers. The anti-virus companies!!! The same companies that create Norton, McAfee , kalipso and even Panda are creating computer virus to sell their products!!!

Spammer???? Are you talking about spam???? Read the article in this link and see who is the great satan. err.... spammer.

http://www.attrition.org/security/rant/av-spammers.html


BeWaRe ThE DoOmSdAy Is CoMiNg!!!! :twisted:
 
Actually, that's not true. And that's not the point either. You get spam if you put your e-mail on the net, and I'm still wondering how long those spam bots will take to pick up on the AT DOT and <no-spam> diversions. A lot of people out there post their e-mail addresses on the internet because they need to be reached, businesses cannot go with the AT DOT or <no-spam> alternatives, because most people don't have a clue what that means. That also means that a lot of businesses will be on a lot of spam-lists. The same goes for most people with websites.
There are such wonderful programs that can sort out mail and separate spam from the real deal, I belive they are called spam assassins. Also there are these other tools out there like ad-aware and antiviruses and you CAN keep your computer safe. Of course if you have some *really* important stuff on your computer you could back up every now and then. And if nothing works use a linux computer as a router, the computer doesn't have to be all that good, definitely not top of the line; so if you want to be safe you can do it.
And yes, there are a lot of morons out there who can't take care of their computers and end up affecting everyone on the net, kind of like global warming :roll: . What do you suppose should be done about it? Try to inform them? Force them? What?
 
Of course, everybody should convert to an operating system where you still have to have Windows on your hard drive to actually do anything.
...
Have you ever tried it? No? Then don't talk about things you don't know anything about. Everything you can do in Windows can be done better faster and more efficiently in Linux. The only difference is user-friendliness, and the fact that most games are created for Windows. If you only have a PC for gaming, though, you should indeed stay with Windows. There is more to a computer than just games.

There are such wonderful programs that can sort out mail and separate spam from the real deal, I belive they are called spam assassins.
You do realise they:
A) Only work on the receiving end, and still collect all the mail and don't prevent the traffic. They just throw it in a seperate mailbox.
B) They're far from perfect.

Also there are these other tools out there like ad-aware and antiviruses and you CAN keep your computer safe.
Yes. But they don't root out spam, do they?
Plus, these anti-viruses (ad-aware has shit to do with viruses) are not perfect either.

Of course if you have some *really* important stuff on your computer you could back up every now and then. And if nothing works use a linux computer as a router, the computer doesn't have to be all that good, definitely not top of the line; so if you want to be safe you can do it.
I never said you couldn't be safe. Listen to what I say, mkay?
I'm getting so fucking tired of people simply not listening to what I say.
And yes, there are a lot of morons out there who can't take care of their computers and end up affecting everyone on the net, kind of like global warming . What do you suppose should be done about it? Try to inform them? Force them? What?
And you just made the point of the article. Weeee
 
You do realise they:
A) Only work on the receiving end, and still collect all the mail and don't prevent the traffic. They just throw it in a seperate mailbox.
B) They're far from perfect.

But since they are in a separate box you can empty with a single click it does get a bit easier.

ad-aware has shit to do with viruses

Ad-aware shit can mine data from your computer, maybe some email addresses.....

My point was that spam is sort of like the rain: all you can do is try to dodge it, but you will get wet, even if just a little.

And you just made the point of the article. Weeee

so we are all doomed! Doomed I tell you! Woe unto us! :look:
 
Makes me glad I work on real viruses. All this smoke, mirrors and misdirection that surrounds computer viruses looks downright impossible by comparison.

/back to the hood
 
But since they are in a separate box you can empty with a single click it does get a bit easier.
I actually have to check my spam mailbox every time before I empty it because it happens occasionally that an important mail gets lost in there.

Ad-aware shit can mine data from your computer, maybe some email addresses.....
That's ad-ware, not ad-aware. ;)

My point was that spam is sort of like the rain: all you can do is try to dodge it, but you will get wet, even if just a little.
Agreed.
 
Back
Top