Yes, they did it and more, the US had also racial segreation at some point, and detention camps based purely on national/racial qualities in WW2 for Japanese citizens. But that doesn't help us now, if we simply go back to point at past stuff like, the US also banned chinese people at some point so this one case should be fine too.
It still doesn't mean what Trump did now, is necessarily constitutional because others might have done the same - or even worse stuff. At which point, do you decide that a law is going to far? Or that something is barely legal? Or that the executive power has gone to far in certain instances? That's why we have the seperation of powers after all, the checks and ballances. Regardless what I think about Trump, and I do agree that Obama got away with a lot of shit, simply because he was 'Obama lord and saviour of the regressive left', but maybe Trump has simply gone one step to far, and the fact that he throws all the time a fucking Tantrum when something doesn't go his way, isn't really helping either. I mean a judge is a person too, and he probably watches TV and gets news information just like everyone else does.
I simply think, the 'right' has to suck this part up, just as how any leftist has to accept that Trump is president.
All I am saying is, I am not a federal judge nor do I have the expertise to say with absolute certainity that Trumps decree was unconstitutional, I mean he (or who ever has written it) consulted the lawayers about it after all - we know that much from Guiliani, I guess in how to make that thing 'legal'. But THAT alone tells us that there was a problem with it right from the begining. I mean there is a reason why you have to study that shit on a university for years.
