Muuuuuuuslim Baaaaaan! But don't call it that!

[DarkCorp]

Could she not have paraphrased? Could she have decided to only read SPECIFIC examples, relevant to the discussion at hand, instead of a whole letter?

If this was indeed the reason for a censure then it could be a legitimate complaint.

I for one dislike emotional and dramatic displays, and would rather quickly get to the point and get to the vote.

 

[CT Phipps]

Could she not have paraphrased? Could she have decided to only read SPECIFIC examples, relevant to the discussion at hand, instead of a whole letter?

If this was indeed the reason for a censure then it could be a legitimate complaint.

I for one dislike emotional and dramatic displays, and would rather quickly get to the point and get to the vote.

Actually, it's the fact the letter "impugned the integrity of a sitting Senator."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/politics/elizabeth-warren-silenced/

It's relevant to the topic at hand and extraordinarily so. Emotional and dramatic displays are also entirely valid with emotional and dramatic subjects.

But that's just my opinion.

Grow a thicker skin GOP and act like men. Don't whine your feelings are getting hurt.

 

[DarkCorp]

And in the same vein, grown ass men and women do not need to cry or otherwise use drama and emotion as a tool to further their own gain. Leave that to Hollywood. Everyone remembers Obamas crocodile tears.


Look at Trump for example, he is getting a TON of shit from the left because he appears to be acting selfishly or from emotion rather than being pragmatic.

I agree this is difficult and not always possible to act without emotion but it should be something to strive for as often as possible, ESPECIALLY, if the person is an elected official.

EDIT: And yea, I would have to agree with you that the specific rule they invoked was kind of arbitrary and also setting the bar kind of low in terms of definition.