I'm sure that's the case but it still doesn't make any sense. What, they all ignored your father and went for every other living being in the place? How did so many get in, did your father leave his exit open (this could work except that they swarmed [would need something like bad weather])? Where are the rad roaches when you leave? That tunnel is pretty empty.Ausir said:Well, they probably slipped into the vault while your dad was leaving it.The rad roaches appear at way too convient of a time and it's pretty stupid, but that's a generic bad plot twist.
MMOs are basically Diablo (rougelike) designed to be addicting above all else, Diablo was designed to be fun above all else.Arash said:Diablo was an ARPG but still, Blizzard didnt have any experience in MMOs too but WoW turned out to be a great product.Blizzard doesn't have any experience with RPGs so I'd be hesitant but not dismissive. Still, wouldn't make the number one choice on my list.
I just said that because Blizzard is one of the companies who "knows" what it is doing.
Well they would release quallity or nothing, they have scrapped some of their projects which didn't turn out well (SC: Ghost, WC: Adventures) so you may get nothing but I agree.raunchy said:blizzard has incredibly high standards and would not release something like bethesda's fallout 3, plain and simple. even if they had jack shit experience in rpgs of the fallout name they would deliver a quality product rest assured.
True, I had frogotten that.Ausir said:Not to mention the fact that Blizzard has 3 original Fallout devs more than Bethesda does (which is 3).
No, just wanted a universally praised serries with an entirely different setting than TES in order to expand Bethesda's portfolio. BN (I think?) had a good explanation for this in another thread.thenightgaunt said:Todd and Pete fans? Eh, maybe. What I mean is I think someone high up in the company had to have been a fan in order for the purchase to get the green light or even be thrown on the table.
D&D is a bad example because while the mechanics have been altered, they have been done so in order to balance the game and make it flow better (no more 4 hour long battles) but keeps the core intact. Also, the complaints about D&D no longer being D&D have been made in every change back to the very start, and the complaint that it's turning it into a video game were made when 3rd edition (which was crap) were released aswell. Besides which, D&D hasn't changed genres or even subgenres, Fallout 3 clearly has.thenightgaunt said:Also, fans rarely agree on the topic of their fandom. Take D&D for example. There are alot of people who consider the older versions to be amazing and the new 4th edition to be nothing but bound, knocked off, world of warcraft esk pig shit. And there are gamers who think that 4th ed is the greatest thing ever and it's the game they allways wanted.
Well lets see, we were not at war with Japan, Tiawan, South Korea, Indonesea, and a lot of other countries. so eh.
You are aware I'm sure of the several million asian-americans in the US.
Well donating to a church also raises your karma so there have been a few things said that raise concern about how religion is treated in the game.Mrxknown said:Seriously? A bible passage and you're done? Seriously? What are you afraid of the bible?
There have been games that use quotes of the bible. None come to mind, but it's just a verse. It's not like it's telling you to worship god, there is no Church quest, or read verses such-and-such.
It's just a game.
No I agree, it depends on whether or not it's part of a bigger issue, in this case:alec said:Oh man. That's just nitpicking. There ain't nothing wrong with quoting the Bible, and this coming from a pure blood atheist.
The Bible is a book, a literary work. There's nothing wrong with quoting a literary work.
Ausir said:Yes, the portrayal of religions in general (and Christianity in particular) seems very positive in Fallout 3, as opposed to a much more cynical approach to religion (and to authority in general, actually) in previous Fallouts.
Brother None said:Heh, you guys are missing quite possibly the worst line from all the footage shown so far.
The new Brotherhood of Steel greeting:
"Steel be with you"
Brother None said:Heh, you guys are missing quite possibly the worst line from all the footage shown so far.
The new Brotherhood of Steel greeting:
"Steel be with you"
Wooz said:So, since the people who took shelter in Vaults were supposed to be the top-of the cream to rebuild the world in America's image after a nuclear war, it's pretty damn unlikely they'd allow someone with a Chinese surname inside.
Even if you're right, there are a lot of asian's in the US with surnames that aren't Chinese.
And as far as I remember from school, it was made sure only Japanese-Americans were put in the concentration camps. They even made extra sure they didn't imprison Chinese and Philippine people since the US was directly collaborating with them against Japan.
alec said:I haven't read the whole thread, 'cause it's so friggin' long, but hey: anyone thought about the possibility that Bethesda itself leaked this?
They generally tried to put only Japanese-Americans in camps but they didn't go through any great effort or bother to remedy their mistakes. I'd also point out that history is written by the winner and thus neither objective nor entirely accurate. Still, you're right that Japanese-Americans were the target but the underlying point is that if there were a vault program, no oriental-American would have been allowed in.mlk said:And as far as I remember from school, it was made sure only Japanese-Americans were put in the concentration camps. They even made extra sure they didn't imprison Chinese and Philippine people since the US was directly collaborating with them against Japan.
They generally tried to put only Japanese-Americans in camps but they didn't go through any great effort or bother to remedy their mistakes. I'd also point out that history is written by the winner and thus neither objective nor entirely accurate. Still, you're right that Japanese-Americans were the target but the underlying point is that if there were a vault program, no oriental-American would have been allowed in.
True, but keep in mind that their other purpose was a morale one and by allowing "the enemies" in, it might backfire. Now if it was a more secret project or one targeting that ethnic group then I think that it would be reasonable.Ausir said:They generally tried to put only Japanese-Americans in camps but they didn't go through any great effort or bother to remedy their mistakes. I'd also point out that history is written by the winner and thus neither objective nor entirely accurate. Still, you're right that Japanese-Americans were the target but the underlying point is that if there were a vault program, no oriental-American would have been allowed in.
Well, since the Vaults were experiments, and not meant to save the people, anything is possible.
Well, since the Vaults were experiments, and not meant to save the people, anything is possible.
Wooz said:Even if you're right, there are a lot of asian's in the US with surnames that aren't Chinese.
a) And this matters how, exactly?
Wooz said:b) As I said before, the world "now" never happened in Fallout.
Wooz said:Your average John Doe didn't give a damn if a person was Japanese, Chinese or Filipino, all that mattered was that they looked similar to their country's enemy, and therefore highly suspicious.
To see how long it takes for everyone to escape, it seems.Wooz said:What's V101's purpose?
UncannyGarlic said:but the underlying point is that if there were a vault program, no oriental-American would have been allowed in.
Wooz said:What's V101's purpose?
Brother None said:Heh, you guys are missing quite possibly the worst line from all the footage shown so far.
The new Brotherhood of Steel greeting:
"Steel be with you"
Now my forehead hurts. Thanks a lot.Brother None said:The new Brotherhood of Steel greeting:
"Steel be with you"