Yeah mate. I know manna/health/endurance + buffs and de buffs have been around a long, long time. Deus Ex did the 'augs' for various improvements very well I think.
I think how it was explained how it worked in a sci-fi ish setting was better than how Fallout 3, 4, and New Vegas even if it is one of my favorite games did it. Or the Outer Worlds right now.
Where an agile character who was a cyber technician with a psi amp implant needed to run medium armour suited.
Yep, it makes players try to think how to best build a character based on the role or this case specific gameplay type character they are playing. You are not able to be good at everything so you have to choose.
Maybe the character you describe can still get to wear heavy armor and not be encumbered by it but it will cost you many upgrade points when it is perhaps better to get a psi upgrade that allows for psionic shielding that costs less points.
I think introducing Ray Tracing and newer brighter, newer this that or the other just pushes consumerism.
Maybe, but you have to admit that graphics when done by a competent artist look great. But if the content behind the graphics is not any good than it does not matter how good it looks. I wish a lot of gamers these days understood that.
When I installed Metro last light it ran like a bag of shite about 30 frames per minute. After ditching one of the graphics settings it ran great looked good so no problem.
My new card is also sort of an investment for the future so that I don't need to upgrade my PC any time soon. I do hope that some games will come out that I want to play that will make good use of it as so far I have been playing a lot of old and indie titles that have no need for it.
It would have cost me about £900 to a grand at that time. I was a bit skint but as you said with bit of saving I could of managed it. But instead I gave some of my downtime to SETI. Typical me.
My neighbor who used to work for a bank explained how bit mining worked and how cheap initially bit coins were and how valuable now. I wish I had understood bitcoins back then, I could have had a future. But I never really learned how to invest even if we during economics class got an assignment in which we had to buy fictional stock from various companies and monitor the market each week to see if our stock had increased in value or not.
Regarding the Outer Worlds, I have finished the Emerald Vale and have reached the Groundbreaker.
Emerald Vale is a really boring opening section and I probably made the mistake of taking too much time to go through it. FNV's was a lot faster in that regard and even in FO3 you could head to more interesting places once you had sufficiently leveled up.
I guess at least it teaches you the mechanics of how gameplay elements work but this is really a section I do not want to go through again.
So far the Board and its members come over as laughably incompetent if their stupidity didn't get people killed.
I am not a very religious person but Scientism (it shares its name with a belief in the Foundation novels) as a company designed religion to make sure that people stay in their place and even develop a loathing for themselves if they are not doing well at the careers is pretty disgusting
Thanks to this conditioning since they are a child they don't dare to questioning the control and power of the higher ups of the companies they work for when it is clear that a lot of these are not suitable to govern a colony.
So far I have seen no argument in favor of it other than that a lot of people believe it is the only way as any rival philosophy has been effective suppressed.
Phineas on the other hand believes in a wild shot that may or may not save the colony, putting all his money on that to work.
If I could I would have jumped on the first interstellar freighter and leave Halcyon to its fate. Maybe the coward's way out but a lot of these people don't want to see there are problems that are not solved if they just stop becoming sick and work harder.