Brother None said:
... Could it be that Bethesda hasn't been able to avoid being the next victim of the
Fallout Curse?...
I don't know, but what I know after seeing some videos and admiring the... "quality" of the product is that the chances of this incident being part of an innovative marketing campaign can be discarded. 'Horrendous' and 'pathetic' can summarize, for me, what I've seen. The character's birth and different life stages part looks stupid, but that's just me; I know that the "You're SPECIAL" child's book is consistent with the situation, but I can't help seeing there a hint about the audience Bethesda is primarily addressing. About the Radroachs...
*sigh* so much for the Vault's sealed security, for the pure sake of an stupid combat quest. Terrible voiceacting and... what to say about the animations?... saying that the chars are literally floating is just an euphemism
. Also, if you're going to do a 3rd person view that looks and feels like crap, then better don't do it and stick with an strict first person; well, in the end it doesn't really matter, as the other npcs moves as awfully as the pc. Finally, the IA doesn't deserve any mention, as doesn't deserve it anything that isn't displayed in the videos we're talking about.
I think that this... "involuntary preview", along with the recent information about some "charisma minigame" for dialogues, is the last nail in the coffin of Fallout 3 not being Oblivion with Guns. With Guns and with Bullet-time for Dummies. Now I finally understand why Bethesda purchased the Fallout franchise: they just needed a well-known name as an excuse for trying to sell us that crap called Oblivion for 2nd time.
Brother None said:
Looking at those videos: Holy shit the voice acting is atrocious. And the animations of characters in dialogue is barely better than in Oblivion.
There's something I don't get. You were one of the NMA members who could see an early preview of the game (the source of the
NMA's Fallout 3 preview) and you've supposedly already seen some of those scenes (the vault, etc)... How is it that you seem surprised? Is it that the preview was shown in a way that avoided the worst part of the animation/voiceacting?... Or is it that, somehow, this looks actually worse than the first time you saw it?...
Ausir said:
In the Beth forum, people are already praising it (until the threads get locked).
Anarchosyn said:
I'm not a Bethesda apologist
Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta.
Anarchosyn said:
but I fail to see the problem here.
Then your Perception score must be bellow 4
Anarchosyn said:
It's better than what we had in Fallout 1 and 2 for immersion
Uh...
Do you know the difference between the concepts "personal opinion" and "proven fact"?
The fact that you like Fallout 3 over it's predecessors doesn't make it automatically "better than what we had in Fallout 1 and 2 for immersion". That's merely your opinion. And... if you really feel immersed in this mess, better said, "bloody mess" of automats floating around, then good for you, I guess...
Anarchosyn said:
and better than Morrowind or Oblivion too.
If by "better" you mean "nearly the same", then we agree.
Anarchosyn said:
The real test is whether my non-combat character will be fun to play and the jury is still out on that one.
Well, it's been stated by some of Beth's heads (Pete or Todd, don't remember) that they didn't recommend that kind of gameplay, so you can get the picture. Anyway, it wasn't hard to deduce: to go through a game whose 90% of appeal is the shooting without firing a single shot couldn't be a fulfilling experience.
Anarchosyn said:
When did RPG fans become whores for graphics?
Uh...
Again, do you know the difference between the concepts "graphics" and "animation"?